On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/24/13 23:23, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
I noticed that in some cases we were failing to find aliasing
information because we were only looking at an SSA_NAME variable,
missing the fact that it was really an ADDR_EXPR. The attached patch
passes bootstrap+testsuite, does it make sense? (I am a bit afraid of
losing some type information for instance)
I didn't investigate the 2 tests where I had to remove dg-bogus, because
removing dg-bogus sounds like a bonus...
2013-10-25 Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr>
gcc/
* tree-ssa-alias.c (ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size): Look for an
ADDR_EXPR in the defining statement.
Shouldn't the ADDR_EXPR have been propagated into the use?
Maybe when the address is a constant, but here it comes from malloc.
--
Marc Glisse
