On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 12:45 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/24/13 11:49, David Malcolm wrote: > > Extend gengtype (and gtype.state reading/writing) so that it is able to > > parse base classes in simple cases, and only attempt to do it for > > GTY-marked types. > > > > * gengtype-parse.c (require_without_advance): New. > > (type): For GTY-marked types that are not GTY((user)), parse any > > base classes, requiring them to be single-inheritance, and not > > be templates. For non-GTY-marked types and GTY((user)), > > continue to skip over any C++ inheritance specification. > > * gengtype-state.c (state_writer::write_state_struct_type): > > Write base class of type (if any). > > (read_state_struct_type): Read base class of type (if any). > > * gengtype.c (new_structure): Add a "base_class" parameter. > > (create_optional_field_): Update for new parameter to > > new_structure. > > (adjust_field_rtx_def): Likewise. > > (adjust_field_tree_exp): Likewise. > > * gengtype.h (struct type): Add "base_class" field to the s > > union field. > > (new_structure): Add "base" parameter. > This is OK. Sorry about belated response.
I've now committed this to trunk as r204003, having doublechecked the bootstrap and testsuites. Thanks Dave
