Hi
3dw...@verizon.net ha scritto: >Let me try that again. Sorry for the dupe and the bad subject in the >previous message. > >This patch fixes a small stylistic nit in the user-defined literal >operators in the standard library.I propose we prefer: operator""suf - >with no spacerather than: operator"" suf - with spaceIt is only >strictly necessary to have no space between quotes and suffix >identifier when the suffix identifier is a keyword. On the other hand, >consistently using no space means never having to say you're sorry. It >is also consistent with our style of not having space between operator >and, say '+'. I believe that first allowing the space in the first >place might have been a mistake in the standard. The (to be committed >tonight) literal operators for complex<float> need to have no space >because the suffix is 'if'. We might as well be consistent. I think >this is better style too. Looks Ok to me. Thanks, Paolo
