Hi Ed, Paolo, On 22 Oct 2013, at 13:55, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> On 10/22/2013 08:37 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> On 10/22/2013 02:28 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: >>> I think this is pretty easy - gnu::deprecated has the same semantics. >> Unfortunately however, gnu::deprecated has a number of long standing issues >> (just search Bugzilla), personally I'm not sure we want to say everybody >> that we have got [[deprecated]] implemented, until those are solved. Just my >> personal opinion. >> > I'll check bugzilla. We'll hold… Is PR17729 still the most significant? (there are related test-suite ones). unfortunately, I still don't have time to address this - but perhaps someone could update the attempt I made before? It would be nice to fix it and to add the associated "unavailable" error attribute ... Iain
