On 21 Oct 12:08, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>
> > + if (flag_check_pointers)
> > + {
> > + if (flag_lto)
> > + sorry ("Pointers checker is not yet fully supported for link-time
> > optimization");
>
> That sounds wrong. It suggests some bug somewhere in your patch series
> failing to allow for LTO, which should be fixed. At least give a more
> detailed explanation in a comment of what would need to change to remove
> this call to sorry ().
It has been a while since I saw problem with LTO (some functions appeared to
miss instrumentation; it seemed compilation flags for checker were not handled
correctly for some reason). When I made this branch public I put this guard to
prevent users from falling into this problem. Actually I do not know what is
the current status of that issue. A lot of things has changed including
checker flags definition. I'll try mpx testsuite with LTO and be back with the
result.
>
> > + if (targetm.chkp_bound_mode () == VOIDmode)
> > + error ("-fcheck-pointers is not supported for this target.");
>
> Also note GNU Coding Standards for diagnostics. They should not start
> with uppercase letters or end with ".".
Thanks for input! I'll fix it.
Thanks,
Ilya
>
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
> jos...@codesourcery.com
