Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>On 10/18/2013 04:50 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Sandra Loosemore
>> <san...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>> This patch fixes various -fstrict-volatile-bitfields wrong-code
>bugs,
>>> including instances where bitfield values were being quietly
>truncated as
>>> well as bugs relating to using the wrong width.  The code changes
>are
>>> identical to those in the previous version of this patch series
>(originally
>>> posted in June and re-pinged many times since then), but for this
>version I
>>> have cleaned up the test cases to remove dependencies on header
>files, as
>>> Bernd requested.
>>
>> Ok.
>
>Just to clarify, is this approval unconditional, independent of part 2 
>and other patches or changes still under active discussion?

Yes.

Richard.

>-Sandra


Reply via email to