On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: >>> On Oct 17, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote: >>>>> You probably want to do something similar to what I did in the powerpc. >>>> >>>> I would need the help of target maintainers to fix it this way since >>>> it touches every target and it would take time for me to build and >>>> test every target. >>> >>> For changes that only need a compile to ensure one didn't brake a port, a >>> configure and build of a target is 2 minutes. Over night (6 hours), you >>> can 180 targets. Before you laugh, there are people that have done this >>> sort of building in the past as well. The hardest part, literally, would >>> be to come up with the list of targets. >> >> Thanks. This is the list of affected targets extracted from the link >> JBG pointed to: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/?limit=1500 >> >> "alpha-linux,bfin-elf,cr16-elf,epiphany-elf,frv-linux,h8300-elf,hppa-linux,m32c-elf,m68k-linux,mep-elf,microblaze-linux,mips64el-linux,mips64-linux,mipsel-linux,mips-linux,mmix,nios2-elf,powerpc64le-linux,powerpc64-linux,powerpcle-linux,powerpc-linux,ppc64-linux,ppc-linux,rl78-elf,rs6000-ibm-aix4.3,s390-linux,s390x-linux,sparc64-linux,sparc-linux,spu,spu-elf,vax-linux,xtensa-linux" >> >> Status: With the patch below, x86_64, i386 and powerpc native >> bootstrap is fine. x86_64 has one test regression in >> gfortran.dg/lto/pr45586 which I am looking into. Also, mips and >> mips-64 cross-compiler builds fine. >> >> I can check cross-compile builds on all the affected targets listed >> above. If this all works, I suggest using this patch to put out the >> current fires and proceed with individual changes to each target >> later. Also, there are some test case failures when built in non-sse >> configs in i386. I can get to it after unbreaking this. Is this >> reasonable? > > I am running cross-compile builds on all the 33 failing targets. Like > Mike said, it is only taking a few minutes per target. If there is no > objection, I *will check in* this patch in another 2 hours provided > all 33 targets succeed. This will atleast unblock all targets.
I can build cross-compile on 32/33 targets. I cannot build nios2-unknown-elf alone, I get "*** Configuration nios2-unknown-elf not supported" error. I ran "configure ... target=<blah>" and "make all-gcc" for all the affected targets. I have submitted this one line fix. PR target/57756 * opth-gen.awk: Define target_flags_explicit Index: gcc/opth-gen.awk =================================================================== --- gcc/opth-gen.awk (revision 203807) +++ gcc/opth-gen.awk (working copy) @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ print "};" print "extern struct gcc_options global_options;" print "extern const struct gcc_options global_options_init;" print "extern struct gcc_options global_options_set;" +print "#define target_flags_explicit global_options_set.x_target_flags" print "#endif" print "#endif" print "" Known problems even after this: * i386 test regressions, -mno--sse mode reported by Jakub and a pr45586 fortran test failure. I am working on fixing them. Thanks Sri > > Thanks > Sri > > >> >> Thanks >> Sri >> >> >> Index: opth-gen.awk >> =================================================================== >> --- opth-gen.awk (revision 203779) >> +++ opth-gen.awk (working copy) >> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ >> print "extern struct gcc_options global_options;" >> print "extern const struct gcc_options global_options_init;" >> print "extern struct gcc_options global_options_set;" >> +print "#define target_flags_explicit global_options_set.x_target_flags" >> print "#endif" >> print "#endif" >> print ""
