> -----Original Message----- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On > Behalf Of Mike Stump > Sent: 16 October 2013 23:06 > To: Paulo J.Matos > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Teaching emacs about GCC coding conventions (was Re: [PATCH] > tree_code_name wrapper) > > First, we like to wait and let patches bake on mainline before considering > back > porting, this has no bake time yet in our tree. Second, only patches that > impact > quality enough should be back ported. I tend to think that this one does not > impact quality enough to worry about. Also, you should develop on trunk, not > 4_8. Arguably, I would say no. Now, a release manager can always review > approve > it; it should be very, very low risk. >
Makes sense. Thanks for the clarification. -- Paulo Matos
