Looks like there is some inconsistency between edge hotness and callee
frequency?

David

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Dehao Chen <de...@google.com> wrote:
> This patch forces to use profile info to check if an edge is hot when
> profile is available.
>
> Bootstrapped and passed regression tests.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> Thanks,
> Dehao
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 2013-10-14  Dehao Chen  <de...@google.com>
> * predict.c(cgraph_maybe_hot_edge_p): Decide edge's hotness from profile.
>
> Index: gcc/predict.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/predict.c (revision 203568)
> +++ gcc/predict.c (working copy)
> @@ -185,10 +185,8 @@ maybe_hot_bb_p (struct function *fun, const_basic_
>  bool
>  cgraph_maybe_hot_edge_p (struct cgraph_edge *edge)
>  {
> -  if (profile_info && flag_branch_probabilities
> -      && !maybe_hot_count_p (NULL,
> -                             edge->count))
> -    return false;
> +  if (profile_info && flag_branch_probabilities)
> +    return maybe_hot_count_p (NULL, edge->count);
>    if (edge->caller->frequency == NODE_FREQUENCY_UNLIKELY_EXECUTED
>        || (edge->callee
>    && edge->callee->frequency == NODE_FREQUENCY_UNLIKELY_EXECUTED))

Reply via email to