On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com> wrote: >> Yeah, I thought testing for a PARM_DECL should be sufficient? For >> nested functions references to outer parms should have been lowered via the >> static chain at the point tree-inline.c sees them. > > OK for the latter point, but are you sure for the former? My understanding is > that we're already in SSA form, so parameters can be represented by SSA_NAMEs > without defining statements.
That's true... so you can only simplify is_parameter_of by dropping the context check. Richard. > -- > Eric Botcazou
