Richard Sandiford <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> writes: >> I've looked at the resulting wide-int.h and like it a lot >> compared to what is on the branch (less code duplication for one). >> >> I think we should go ahead with this change (keeping the double-int >> changes out for now, I didn't yet look at that patch). We can >> iterate on the details on the branch. > > Thanks. Kenny also asked me to commit it on IRC, so I was going to go > ahead. But I just tried boostrapping the patch again after Mike's > recent merge with trunk, and it now fails during stage 2 with:
That turned out to be because of the __optimize__(0)s that I'd added to work around the RA bug. After checking with Kenny, I've now committed both the RA patch and this patch to the branch. Thanks, Richard
