Hi Honza,
On 09/06/2013 01:05 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this is the patch I commited after testing on x86_64-linux.
Honza
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
*** ChangeLog (revision 202271)
--- ChangeLog (working copy)
***************
*** 1,3 ****
--- 1,9 ----
+ 2013-09-04 Jan Hubicka <j...@suse.cz>
+
+ PR middle-end/58201
+ * cgraphunit.c (analyze_functions): Clear AUX fields
+ after processing; initialize assembler name has.
+
I checked and double checked and with this commit a C++ test regressed:
FAIL: g++.dg/template/cond2.C -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line 9)
FAIL: g++.dg/template/cond2.C -std=gnu++11 (test for warnings, line 9)
In practice we emit a message off by one line, line 10 instead of the
correct line 9. Is it possible that you are clearing too much, so to speak?
After the recent breakages, up to date testresults are arriving only now
on gcc-testresults confirming my finding, for example Andreas Schwab
already posted a couple.
Thanks!
Paolo.
