On 5 September 2013 13:02:29 Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
On 04 Sep 20:11, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> On 4/09/2013, at 7:43 PM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> The patch is OK with definitions of OPTION_GLIBC, OPTION_UCLIBC and
OPTION_BIONIC copied verbatim from gcc/config/l
Checked into main trunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-09/msg00137.html
Unless i am missing something crucial I am not really convinced that this
bionic support stuff you guys are aiming at is proper, to be defensive..
uClibc has C99 math support optionally as well as other optional,
nonstandard feature sets. Your patch does not seem to check (in a
cross-compilable fashion, of course) if C99 math is supported in libc or
not, thus regressing on uClibc with C99_MATH enabled.
Please revert this patch and handle your libc in a sensible manner as
everyone else has to since years.. I.e. either be C99 complete or fixup
your conditions, ideally in the public port.
Thanks,
--
Thanks, K
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
