On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > Or are you suggesting that coretypes.h is a file we can assume is available? > that seems like a bit of a slippery slope, but we could pick a few. I > prefer it be explicit myself.
coretypes.h is available. Why do you think that's a slippery slope? The name of this header file already suggests its purpose: Define the core types - to *avoid* having to include files like bitmap.h if you really only want "struct bitmap_head; typedef struct bitmap_head *bitmap;". Ciao! Steven
