Hi,
>> Or you mean something else? > >I was thinking that the recursive part could be a simple loop to set >access, but your way is fine too. Ok, great. Note, before committing I mean to also simplify it a bit, the TREE_STATIC check of the recursive part has no reason to exist, doesn't exist in the current code handling the fields of an anon aggr. All in all I rather prefer this kind of solution, in my opinion the typical recursion here is very shallow and in this way the amount of new code is minimized. Thanks, Paolo
