Hi, On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 03:21:22PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > Apart from the GTY aspect, how do people feel about the patch series? > FWIW I have vague thoughts about doing something similar for tree - > doing so *might* give an easier route to the type vs expression > separation that Andrew spoke about at the Cauldron rearchitecture BoF. > (I started looking at doing a similar C++-ification of rtx, but... > gahhhhh) >
I like it but before you start looking at the biger things, could you perhpas proceed with the symtab? It has much fewer classes, will probably affect private development of fewer people, the accessor macros/functions of symtab are less developed so it will immediately really make code nicer, Honza has approved it and I'm really looking forward to it. Also, perhaps it will show us at much saller scale potential problems with the general scheme. I'm only writing this because the development there seems a bit stalled and it it a shame. Of course, you ay want to simplify the manual markings first. I'd perfectly understand that. Thanks, Martin
