On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 08:58:43AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> wrote: >> >> > And the manual GTY markers are so not maintainable in the long run, >> > gengtype or something else really needs to be taught to create them >> > automatically. >> >> I thought the principle that was acquired was that gengtype shouldn't >> be improved to support more than what it does now…. > > If it means that we'll need to write and maintain tons of hand written code > that could otherwise be generated and maintained by a tool for us, that > principle doesn't look very good. > > Jakub
Back in March 2013, I asked about gengtype support for inheritance. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-03/msg00273.html This http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-03/msg00295.html was the definitive answer that appeared to be the consensus. -- Gaby
