Hi Gerald,
it looks this patch did not get applied. Is this because you
failed to get approval?
Yes. :-(
With a patch Joseph did recently, this would now be in gcc/target.def,
and from what I can see both parts of the patch are fine.
Unless anyone objects, can you please ago ahead and commit an
update patch?
Thanks. I have gone ahead and checked in this patch:
Cheers
Nick
gcc/ChangeLog
2013-08-20 Nick Clifton <ni...@redhat.com>
* target.def (narrow_volatile_bitfield): Note that the default
value is false, not !TARGET_STRICT_ALIGN.
* doc/tm.texi: Regenerate.
Index: target.def
===================================================================
--- target.def (revision 201870)
+++ target.def (working copy)
@@ -1967,7 +1967,7 @@
should use the narrowest mode possible. It should return @code{false}
if\n\
these accesses should use the bitfield container type.\n\
\n\
-The default is @code{!TARGET_STRICT_ALIGN}.",
+The default is @code{false}.",
bool, (void),
hook_bool_void_false)
