---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tim Shen <timshe...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:26 PM Subject: Re: [regex] New enum type syntax_option_type To: Daniel Krügler <daniel.krueg...@gmail.com> Cc: libstdc++ <libstd...@gcc.gnu.org>
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Krügler
<daniel.krueg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Due to Tim Shen's recent activities at regex improvements we have in
> libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex_constants.h now
>
> enum syntax_option_type { .. };
>
> instead of the previous
>
> typedef unsigned int syntax_option_type;
>
> That change makes sense to me, but the question arises to me:
> Shouldn't this enum get an explicit underlying type, such as
>
> enum syntax_option_type : unsigned int { .. };
>
> to keep the ABI more stable even if new enumerators would be added?
>
> - Daniel
Great, let's test it now, though I don't think that it breaks something.
--
Tim Shen
--
Tim Shen
changelog
Description: Binary data
a.patch
Description: Binary data
