On Jul 19, 2013, at 11:46 PM, Joern Rennecke <joern.renne...@embecosm.com>
wrote:
> Tested for avr with --target_board=atmega128-sim and native on
> i686-pc-linuc-gnu.
>
> 2013-07-17 Joern Rennecke <joern.renne...@embecosm.com>
>
> * c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-2.c: Run test only for
> target { ! int16 }.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr54245.c: Do slsr scan only for target { ! int16 }.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-1.c: Adjust multiplicators to scan for for
> target { int16 }. Restrict existing tests to target { int32 }
> where appropriate.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-2.c, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-27.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-28.c, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-29.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-3.c, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ccp-23.c: Likewise.
> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_int32): New proc.
Ok.
I'd recommend an Ok? in patches that seek approval or explicit review.
Sometimes people post patches that are trivial and just check them in.
