On Tue, 2013-08-06 12:06:24 -0400, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 13:12 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-08-05 20:16:05 -0000, dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org > > <dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: [Breakage on epiphany-elf]
> I'm kicking off a bootstrap of this (on x86_64) to further verify that > the non-epiphany changes are good. What other testing can I do to > verify this? Dunno. I didn't do more than that with my build robot. Specifically, I don't have the hardware, so I cannot recommend any further tests. Maybe the port maintainer (added) could run a gcc built with your patch[1] to verify it's still working? MfG, JBG [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00286.html -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481 Signature of: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html the second :
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
