On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Adam Butcher <a...@jessamine.co.uk> wrote:
> ---
> gcc/cp/pt.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> index a7baaba..99bc71b 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> @@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ determine_specialization (tree template_id,
> tree decl_arg_types;
>
> /* This is an ordinary member function. However, since
> - we're here, we can assume it's enclosing class is a
> + we're here, we can assume its enclosing class is a
> template class. For example,
>
> template <typename T> struct S { void f(); };
> @@ -4337,7 +4337,7 @@ check_default_tmpl_args (tree decl, tree parms, bool
> is_primary,
> || DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P (decl)))
> /* We already checked these parameters when the template was
> declared, so there's no need to do it again now. This function
> - was defined in class scope, but we're processing it's body now
> + was defined in class scope, but we're processing its body now
> that the class is complete. */
> return true;
>
> @@ -7482,7 +7482,7 @@ lookup_template_class_1 (tree d1, tree arglist, tree
> in_decl, tree context,
> the one of #0.
>
> When we encounter #1, we want to store the partial instantiation
> - of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in it's CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE.
> + of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in its CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE.
>
> For all cases other than this "explicit specialization of member of a
> class template", we just want to store the most general template into
> --
> 1.8.3
>
OK.
Do you have copyright assignment on file?
-- Gaby
