On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:02:29PM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Trevor Saunders <tsaund...@mozilla.com> > wrote: > > bootstrapped and same test results on x86_64-linux-gnu against r201084 > > > > gcc/cp/ > > * cxx-pretty-print.h (cxx_pretty_printer): inherit from > > c_pretty_printer > > instead of include it. > > * (cxx_pretty_print.c): adjust accordingly. > > This is on my todo stack; thanks for looking into it. > > The way to handle this is: > > * yes, use inheritance -- that is what I simulated with the C abstractions > * declare the "pointer to function fields" as virtual functions -- > that is what I meant > with the (necessarily poor) emulation through the casts. > * override those that needed to be overridden in cxx_pretty_printer. > * adjust the macros. > * Have the associated constructors do the right thing.
I agree with all of that, I was just trying to keep patches small but if you prefer I guess I could do one giant patch that redoes all of this. Trev > > > > -- Gaby