On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:02:29PM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Trevor Saunders <tsaund...@mozilla.com> 
> wrote:
> > bootstrapped and same test results on x86_64-linux-gnu against r201084
> >
> > gcc/cp/
> >         * cxx-pretty-print.h (cxx_pretty_printer): inherit from 
> > c_pretty_printer
> >         instead of include it.
> >         * (cxx_pretty_print.c): adjust accordingly.
> 
> This is on my todo stack; thanks for looking into it.
> 
> The way to handle this is:
> 
>   * yes, use inheritance -- that is what I simulated with the C abstractions
>   * declare the "pointer to function fields" as virtual functions --
> that is what I meant
>     with the (necessarily poor) emulation through the casts.
>   * override those that needed to be overridden  in cxx_pretty_printer.
>   * adjust the macros.
>   * Have the associated constructors do the right thing.

I agree with all of that, I was just trying to keep patches small but if
you prefer I guess I could do one giant patch that redoes all of this.

Trev

> 
> 
> 
> -- Gaby

Reply via email to