Hi,
The problem appears in revision 201034 in version 4.9. I attached a
one-line patch that fixes it. I also reported this problem
at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57802
Bootstrap and regression-tested on x86_64-linux.
In method "set_loop_bounds()" in gcc/fortran/trans-array.c, the loop
on line 4456 should break immediately after "nonoptional_arr" is set
to "true".
2013-07-23 Chang <pcha...@cs.wisc.edu>
* trans-array.c (set_loop_bounds): Exit loop after
setting nonoptional_arr.
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (revision 201034)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (working copy)
@@ -4456,7 +4456,10 @@
for (ss = loop->ss; ss != gfc_ss_terminator; ss = ss->loop_chain)
if (ss->info->type != GFC_SS_SCALAR && ss->info->type != GFC_SS_TEMP
&& ss->info->type != GFC_SS_REFERENCE && !ss->info->can_be_null_ref)
- nonoptional_arr = true;
+ {
+ nonoptional_arr = true;
+ break;
+ }
/* We use one SS term, and use that to determine the bounds of the
loop for this dimension. We try to pick the simplest term. */
-Chang
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (revision 201034)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (working copy)
@@ -4456,7 +4456,10 @@
for (ss = loop->ss; ss != gfc_ss_terminator; ss = ss->loop_chain)
if (ss->info->type != GFC_SS_SCALAR && ss->info->type != GFC_SS_TEMP
&& ss->info->type != GFC_SS_REFERENCE && !ss->info->can_be_null_ref)
- nonoptional_arr = true;
+ {
+ nonoptional_arr = true;
+ break;
+ }
/* We use one SS term, and use that to determine the bounds of the
loop for this dimension. We try to pick the simplest term. */