On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote: > They're not specified by the standard, it says > > // these members are shown for exposition only: > > Which means the names are used only for the purposes of describing the > semantics of the class, they are not normative requirements. See > 17.5.2.3 [objects.within.classes].
I see. Are other parts ok? Could you please look at them? Thank you! -- Tim Shen
