"Maciej W. Rozycki" <ma...@codesourcery.com> writes: > I have regression-tested this change with the mips-linux-gnu target and > the mips32r2/o32 multilib. I have also verified that the instructions > affected were absent across the binaries produced by the testsuite before > applying this change and present afterwards. For some reason only MADD.S, > MADD.D, MSUB.S and MSUB.D instructions were produced though -- it looks > like none of NMADD.S, NMADD.D, NMSUB.S and NMSUB.D instructions has > coverage in our testsuite.
Hmm, can you double-check? We have gcc.target/mips/nmadd-*, so if we're not producing the instructions there then that sounds like a bug. Thanks, Richard