On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 09:49 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 08:08 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > > Then I agree that the hunk should be reverted so that HTM does not imply > > POWER8. > > Ok, I'll bootstrap and regtest just to be sure there is no unintended > fallout for such a small path before committing. Thanks.
Ok, committed as revision 200985. Thanks. Peter
