On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 05:54:10PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> I don't really see why, as I am still calling c_build_vec_perm_expr
> in the same cases, just possibly not exactly with the same arguments
> (they don't go through build_non_dependent_expr, but Jason seemed to
> imply that it did not matter since we don't look too deep through
> the arguments).
I guess you're right. If the c_* routine doesn't mind C++ specific trees
and just cares about their types and pt.c then instantiates it, then it is
fine.
Jakub
