On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 11:49 +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote: > You're right, that was missing for x86 as well. Please see the updated > second patch that is attached. It additionally checks htm_fastpath to > see whether we are actually using the HTM. This variable is initialized > to the value that htm_init() returns. This should do the right thing I > suppose.
Of course you're right too. I totally missed we were already caching that value. Ok, I removed the unneeded call to htm_available() in my htm_transaction_active() and all is well using your second patch. Thanks again! Peter
