Yes, I was planning to do it after second patch is in the trunk. Thanks for pointing out exact places!
Igor -----Original Message----- From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Tobias Burnus Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 5:24 PM To: Zamyatin, Igor Cc: GCC Patches (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org); ubiz...@gmail.com; ysrum...@gmail.com; Melik-adamyan, Areg Subject: Re: [x86, PATCH 1/2] Enabling of the new Intel microarchitecture Silvermont Zamyatin, Igor wrote: > Several weeks ago Intel announced new microarchitecture named Silvermont (see > for example > http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2013/05/06/intel-launches-low-power-high-performance-silvermont-microarchitecture > ). > This patch is the first and it enables Silvermont architecture in the GCC > compiler (second patch will add some performance related features). > * config/i386/i386.md (cpu): Add new value "slm". I think you should document the newly supported value in gcc/doc/invoke.texi - and probably also mention it in the GCC 4.9's release notes http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html under "New Targets and Target Specific Improvements" Tobias
