On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:12:14PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 22 May 2013 16:36:52 David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:05:47AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > >>> Why does cross need the functions in libgcc and not provided by the > >>> linker? > >> > >> Only the ppc64 linker provides save/restore functions magically. > > > >Okay, then the patch is okay. > > Hmm. I cannot look right now, does that sound like a cure for PR53803 too?
No, since your libgcc.a already contains the save/restore functions. Seems to me that PR53803 is a case of self-inflicted wounds. You link with -nostdlib and don't add -lgcc, then are surprised that the linker complains about functions provided by libgcc? -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
