On 1 May 2013 10:50, Ian Bolton <ian.bol...@arm.com> wrote: > Thanks for the review. I've fixed this up in the attached patch, by > counting the number of matches for the first rule and expecting it to > match additional times to cover the overlap with the lsl based rule. > > I've also renamed the testcases in line with the suggested GCC testcase > naming convention. > > OK for commit? > > Cheers, > Ian > > > 2013-05-01 Ian Bolton <ian.bol...@arm.com> > > * gcc.target/aarch64/ands_1.c: New test. > * gcc.target/aarch64/ands_2.c: Likewise
OK /Marcus
