On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 17:28 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Bill Schmidt
> <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 21:25 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 03:45:17PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> >> > 2013-05-05  Bill Schmidt  <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> >
> >> >     * gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c (slsr_process_phi): Re-enable.
> >> >     (find_candidates_in_block): Re-enable slsr_process_phi.
> >> >     (create_phi_basis): Fix double counting of candidate adjustment.
> >>
> >> This broke gcc.dg/pr33017.c testcase on i?86/x86_64 -m32.
> >> ./cc1 -O2 -ftree-vectorize -m32 -mno-sse pr33017.c
> >
> > Jakub, thanks, I'll take a look.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >> difference between r19862{6,7} is:
> >> --- pr33017.s1        2013-05-06 21:22:03.786745422 +0200
> >> +++ pr33017.s2        2013-05-06 21:22:16.844673015 +0200
> >> @@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ foo:
> >>       movb    $87, var.1373+2(%eax)
> >>       je      .L10
> >>       cmpl    $3, %edx
> >> -     movb    $87, var.1373+3(%eax)
> >> +     movb    $87, var.1373+2(%eax,%eax)
> >>       jne     .L11
> >> -     movb    $87, var.1373+4(%eax)
> >> +     movb    $87, var.1373+2(%eax,%eax,2)
> >>       movl    $3, %ebp
> >>       movl    $61, 28(%esp)
> >>  .L3:
> >>
> >>       Jakub
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> It also caused:
> 
> 
> AIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-28.c -flto execution test
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-28.c execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_9.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_9.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_9.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -funroll-loops  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_9.f90  -O3 -g  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_result_3.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_result_3.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_result_3.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -funroll-loops  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_result_3.f90  -O3 -g  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/cray_pointers_2.f90  -O  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_2.f03  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_2.f03  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_2.f03  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -funroll-loops  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_2.f03  -O3 -g  execution test
> 
> on i686.
> 
> --
> H.J.
> 

H.J., do you know whether the proposed patch fixes these failures?  I'll
take a look at these tomorrow if not.

Thanks,
Bill



Reply via email to