On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Jerry DeLisle <jvdeli...@charter.net> wrote: > I don't see much point in issuing a warning if we accept it. I can just as > easily make it an error with something like "A value separator is required > before a namelist comment" and be done with trying to second guess whether > someone is using namelists right or not. > > An error would be most consistent across all variable kinds. > > Any other opinions out there?
- I don't like the idea of printing a runtime warning either - users are likely to ignore such things anyway. - Different behavior with different -std= switches should be avoided if possible - it just makes coding and testing more difficult than it already is. So my preference would be to generate an error, or if this is a common extension in other compilers, accept it silently (and add a note about it in the manual). -- Janne Blomqvist
