Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-04/msg00272.html
Also pending: use-associated NULL() at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-05/msg00006.html
Tobias Burnus wrote:
The issue was found by Reinhold Bader when testing the Fortran-Dev
branch (thanks!), but it also affects GCC 4.6 and later.
The patch is rather obvious: The segfault occured as
tail->u.ar.start[i] == NULL. An alternative is to could use "continue"
instead of "break".
Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
OK for the trunk?
Tobias
PS: The test case is invalid Fortran 2003 but valid Fortran 2008. As
gfortran lacks that feature, it unconditionally rejects the test case.
Work around is to add a "(1)" to the alloc-expr.
