From: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com> The hashtab pointer hash function is not very good. It throws most of the bits in the pointer away.
This changes pointer_hash to use the mix code from jhash function that mixes all the bits on the pointer and makes them dependent on each other, before doing the modulo. libiberty/: 2013-04-18 Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com> * hashtab.c (hash_pointer): Move to end of file and reimplement. --- libiberty/hashtab.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/libiberty/hashtab.c b/libiberty/hashtab.c index dfaec0f..f714a85 100644 --- a/libiberty/hashtab.c +++ b/libiberty/hashtab.c @@ -194,14 +194,6 @@ higher_prime_index (unsigned long n) return low; } -/* Returns a hash code for P. */ - -static hashval_t -hash_pointer (const PTR p) -{ - return (hashval_t) ((intptr_t)p >> 3); -} - /* Returns non-zero if P1 and P2 are equal. */ static int @@ -988,3 +980,27 @@ iterative_hash (const PTR k_in /* the key */, /*-------------------------------------------- report the result */ return c; } + +/* Returns a hash code for pointer P. Simplified version of evahash */ + +static hashval_t +hash_pointer (const PTR p) +{ + intptr_t v = (intptr_t)p; + unsigned a, b, c; + a = b = 0x9e3779b9; + if (sizeof(intptr_t) == 4) + { + /* Mix as 16bit for now */ + a += v >> 16; + b += v & 0xffff; + } + else + { + a += v >> 32; + b += v & 0xffffffff; + } + c = 0x42135234; + mix(a, b, c); + return c; +} -- 1.8.1.4