Thanks Richard, nice adding, regression passed on my x86_64 GNU/Linux

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Richard Biener
<richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>> I do not have write access to GCC SVN repository, can you commit it for me?
>> Thanks alot
>
> Committed with adding { dg-require-weak "" } to the testcase.
>
> Richard.
>
>> Cheers
>> Zhouyi
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Richard Biener
>>> > <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>Can you trigger this message to show up with -Winline before/after the
>>> >> patch?
>>> >>Can you please add a testcase then?
>>> > Thanks Richard for reviewing, from my point of view about gcc and my
>>> > invoking of gcc, -Winline
>>> > only works on callees that be declared "inline", but if the callee is
>>> > declared
>>> > "inline", it will be AVAIL_AVAILABLE in function can_inline_edge_p, thus
>>> > out of the
>>> > range of my patch.
>>>
>>> Ah, indeed ...
>>>
>>> > So I only add a testcase for fixing the tree dump, are there any thing
>>> > more I can do?
>>>
>>> No.  Patch is ok.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Richard.
>>>
>>> > Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64-linux
>>> >
>>> > ChangeLog:
>>> > 2013-04-08 Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouz...@ict.ac.cn>
>>> >            * cif-code.def (OVERWRITABLE): correct the comment for
>>> > overwritable
>>> >             function
>>> >            * ipa-inline.c (can_inline_edge_p): let dump mechanism report
>>> > the inline
>>> >            fail caused by overwritable functions.
>>> >            * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/inline-11.c: New test
>>> >
>>> > Index: gcc/cif-code.def
>>> > ===================================================================
>>> > --- gcc/cif-code.def    (revision 197549)
>>> > +++ gcc/cif-code.def    (working copy)
>>> > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ DEFCIFCODE(REDEFINED_EXTERN_INLINE,
>>> >  /* Function is not inlinable.  */
>>> >  DEFCIFCODE(FUNCTION_NOT_INLINABLE, N_("function not inlinable"))
>>> >
>>> > -/* Function is not overwritable.  */
>>> > +/* Function is overwritable.  */
>>> >  DEFCIFCODE(OVERWRITABLE, N_("function body can be overwritten at link
>>> > time"))
>>> >
>>> >  /* Function is not an inlining candidate.  */
>>> > Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/inline-11.c
>>> > ===================================================================
>>> > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/inline-11.c   (revision 0)
>>> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/inline-11.c   (working copy)
>>> > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>>> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
>>> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-einline" } */
>>> > +int w;
>>> > +int bar (void) __attribute__ ((weak));
>>> > +int bar (){
>>> > +  w++;
>>> > +}
>>> > +void foo()
>>> > +{
>>> > +  bar();
>>> > +}
>>> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "function body can be overwritten
>>> > at link time" 1 "einline" } } */
>>> > +/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "einline" } } */
>>> > Index: gcc/ipa-inline.c
>>> > ===================================================================
>>> > --- gcc/ipa-inline.c    (revision 197549)
>>> > +++ gcc/ipa-inline.c    (working copy)
>>> > @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ can_inline_edge_p (struct cgraph_edge *e
>>> >    else if (avail <= AVAIL_OVERWRITABLE)
>>> >      {
>>> >        e->inline_failed = CIF_OVERWRITABLE;
>>> > -      return false;
>>> > +      inlinable = false;
>>> >      }
>>> >    else if (e->call_stmt_cannot_inline_p)
>>> >      {
>>
>>

Reply via email to