Le 04/04/2013 00:56, Tobias Burnus a écrit :
> Am 04.04.2013 00:27, schrieb Mikael Morin:
>> Le 02/04/2013 19:19, Tobias Burnus a écrit :
>>> {
>>> snprintf (message, MSGLEN,
>>> "Read kind %d %s where kind %d is required for item %d",
>>> - dtp->u.p.saved_length, type_name (dtp->u.p.saved_type), len,
>>> + type == BT_COMPLEX ? dtp->u.p.saved_length / 2
>>> + : type == BT_COMPLEX,
>> thinko?
>
> Rather "copy&pasto": Obviously, it should be ": dtp->u.p.saved_length,"
> in the last line.
>
> OK with that changed (after regtesting)?
>
Yes.
