On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux again, tested also on > the testcase from the PR (gdb apparently still hasn't been fixed so its > issues are still there, but the output looks good from gcc and at least > about half of the cases handles gdb right or partly right; what gdb doesn't > handle (prints <optimized>) is DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer to DIE with > DW_AT_const_value, and it would be nice if it was able to print implicit > pointer arrays or strings rather than just individual array entries or > characters). > > Ok for trunk?
Thanks, this is OK. -cary
