Re: [PATCH] Fix up adjust_return_value_with_ops (PR tree-optimization/56539)

[Jeff Law]

On 03/06/2013 04:28 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 03:00:49PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
Doesn't the code in update_accumulator_with_ops need the same
change?

No, the difference is that it uses false as the next to last argument,
i.e. inserts after gsi, in which case GSI_CONTINUE_LINKING is desirable,
so that the stmt is inserted after that.
Thanks.  Just wanted to make sure -- I've never had to ponder how the 
GSI/BSI linking code works much.

Jeff