On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds like a DUP of http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16350 > Is the missing hunk in by now (cannot look myself right now)?
The commit you describe appears to be in trunk but not in gcc-4_7-branch. I don't think the problem described in that bug is not a duplicate of my problem - for gcc-4.8-20130210 (which includes that change) I have to add my TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN_DEFAULT=1 change to make building for my processor work, and gcc-4.7.2 also works for my processor using my patch. Seth
