On Feb 14, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Xinliang David Li <davi...@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Matt <m...@use.net> wrote: >> The attached patches do two things: >> 1. Backports a fix from trunk that eliminates bogus warning traces. On my >> current codebase which links ~40MB of C++ with LTO, the bogus warning traces >> are literally hundreds of lines. > > What is the trunk revision? Richard's original patch was committed to trunk in r195884. >> I verified the backport fixed our issue by doing doing a profiledbootstrap >> using the bootstrap-lto.mk config with -O3 added. I used the resulting >> compiler on the proprietary codebase, C++Benchmark, scummvm, and a few other >> open source projects to validate. >> >> 2. Our primary development platform is RHEL6.1-based, and the recent >> autoconf requirement bump locked us out. I lowered the version, and saw no >> difference in ability to configure/bootstrap. >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> -- >> tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave. >> http://www.clock.org/~matt
