Hi,
here's a patch that adds a testcase for PR 55987.
Is xfail the right thing to use here? I went with that since I guess the
PR won't be fixed anytime soon ;)

I haven't assigned copyright to the FSF -- is this patch small enough to
go in without it?

Thanks,
Tilman

2013-02-14  Tilman Sauerbeck  <til...@code-monkey.de>

        PR target/55987
        * gcc.target/arm/pr55987.c: New.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr55987.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr55987.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7dd9de0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr55987.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times ".word" 1 { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bic" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+
+unsigned f(unsigned x, unsigned y)
+{
+       unsigned c = 0x7f7f7f7f;
+
+       return (x & c) ^ (y & ~c);
+}

Reply via email to