On 11 February 2013 19:15, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 11 February 2013 17:18, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> >> I think it's Ok, yes. Thanks. However, I would appreciate if somebody with a >> glibc 2.17 system at hand could double check. Maybe HJ? > > Although I'm sure Carlos is right that they're close enough to not > need checking, I've got a Rawhide setup with glibc 2.17 so I can test > it, just to be sure.
Julian's patch does indeed fix the test failures on glibc 2.17, so is OK to commit. Thanks!
