> Hmm, how would anyone else get at the "padding" info dealing with the > parallel? This looks broken if we need access to the type :/
Yes, you need to access the type for return values, but that's not really new. > Eric, any comments? Richard's patch seems fine to me, modulo the name of the routine; I'd rather use maybe_emit_group_store or something along these lines. -- Eric Botcazou
