Hi, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> ha scritto:
>On 12/21/2012 06:38 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> I was looking a bit more into this Bug, and something seems still >weird about the testcase in Comment #1 of the audit trail, which we >also didn't reject with 4.6.x: > >What's weird about it? Well, we still reject it after the patch, whereas we didn't in 4.6.x. Apparently - I didn't check - clang also accepts it. By 'weird' I meant, isn't clear that the Bug is completely resolved... Paolo
