On 27/11/12 20:47, Mike Stump wrote:
On Nov 27, 2012, at 8:51 AM, James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote:
In particular, we add support for vectorizing across:
ceil (), ceilf (), lceil (),
We add testcases ensuring that each of the expected functions are
vectorized. As the i386 and rs6000 backends both ostensibly support
these optimisations we add these tests to the generic testsuites, but
only wire them up for AArch64. As a target may support any subset of
these vectorizations we need a check_effective_target macro for
each of them.
Because of this change to the generic test code I've CCed Janis
Johnson and Mike Stump.
Gosh… leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I see why you did it that way… So,
let me just ping folks, anyone see a better way to do this? If no one admits
to having a better solution, I'll approve it. Let's give them a few days to
come up with something concrete, if they fail, Ok.
I've been pondering this one for a bit. I wonder if having a single
function
check_effective_target_vect_libcall(func)
where func is the name of the function you needed to check, might be
cleaner.
The idea is that the one function might access an array (set up on the
first call) and then just use "info exists et_vect_libcalls(func)" to do
the body of the check.
Not entirely sure my expect foo is good enough to code this up, though.
R.
