On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> wrote: > I did mark the file as binary on June 11, 2012. I checked a current > SVN working directory and it is marked as binary for me (use svn > proplist and svn propget svn:mime-type to see this).
Yup, svn looks good. > If you are using the git repository, is it possible that git is > somehow not reflecting that change? something seems to have messed it up for me. I went back and checked the unmodified git which serves as the base for my branch, and it came up correctly. Very odd. git log seems to blame git merge. :-( Sounds like a git edge case they got wrong. Since svn and git get the right contents, there isn't anything to fix that I know of. Thanks.
