On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:42:08PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > So, this one fails because we don't instrument string literals, in GCC >> > they aren't anything close to global variables (like they are in LLVM?) >> >> In LLVM, string literals are just regular constant global arrays of chars. >> And global overflows in such literals are remarkably frequent, so it's >> a good idea to implement this. > > Yeah, I'm almost done with it. > >> > This one fails to match because the filename in that case isn't >> > asan_test.cc, but asan_test.C. Can it use say >> > ASAN_TEST_NAME macro, >> > #ifndef ASAN_TEST_NAME >> > # define ASAN_TEST_NAME "asan_test.cc" >> > #endif >> > >> > and replace "zoo.*asan_test.cc" with "zoo.*" ASAN_TEST_NAME (and similarly >> > in one of the disabled tests)? Then asan_test.C could just >> > #define ASAN_TEST_NAME "asan_test.C" >> > before #include "asan_test.cc" >> >> I'd rather replace it with a regexp asan_test.{cc,C} or even simpler, >> drop the extension. Ok? > > That would be asan_test.(cc|C) (or does gtest have some weirdo regexp > extensions (I'm just aware that it is a subset). > But yeah, dropping the extension altogether is fine with me.
Just dropped the extension in upstream r169392. At some point we need to update the libsanitizer/merge.sh to automatically merge the tests, but perhaps only after all the tests start passing. --kcc > > Jakub