> OK. The current recursive force-mem-to-reg cases in store_bit_field_1 > and extract_bit_field_1 don't handle -fstrict-volatile-bitfields at all, > so this patch was trying to fix what seemed like an oversight. Is it OK > to leave the code as-is (not handling -fstrict-volatile-bitfields), > or do I need to add new code to the expmed.c routines?
The former, I think. -- Eric Botcazou
